By SHUNSUKE ABE/ Staff Writer
March 24, 2022 at 16:10 JST
The Supreme Court in Tokyo (Asahi Shimbun file photo)
The Supreme Court upheld the dismissals of lawsuits seeking damages over Japan’s single-surname rule for married couples, but two of the five justices said the one-name provisions are unconstitutional.
According to the decision by the top court’s Third Petty Bench dated March 22, the plaintiffs’ requests for damages “do not constitute a valid reason for appealing” the earlier rulings that rejected the lawsuits.
Therefore, the dismissals of the lawsuits at district and high courts in Tokyo and Hiroshima were finalized.
The seven plaintiffs in the two lawsuits argued that they had suffered mentally because they could not register their marriages using separate surnames.
Article 750 of the Civic Code stipulates that married couples must use a single surname, while Article 74 of the Family Registration Law has a similar rule for its marriage notification procedures.
The plaintiffs said these laws have prevented them from obtaining “social approval as married couples” and denied them tax and other benefits.
The seven plaintiffs--six from Tokyo and Izumi Onji, a doctor in Hiroshima city—are all in de facto marriages using dual surnames.
They said the provisions violate the Constitution and were seeking acceptance of their marriage registrations under separate surnames.
The top court last year said the Diet, which represents the people, should decide what system to adopt concerning the surname issue.
The Diet, however, has not taken up the issue.
Two of the justices on the bench, Eriko Watanabe, a former lawyer, and Katsuya Uga, a former academic scholar, agreed that the single-surname provisions violate Article 24 of the Constitution that guarantees marital freedom.
However, in rejecting the lawsuits, they said that “the legislative omission of the Diet” was not serious enough to grant damages.
Justice Michiharu Hayashi presided over the hearing.
Last June, all 15 Supreme Court justices attended the Grand Bench to hear cases involving the dual surname issue.
Eleven of the justices said the single-surname rule was constitutional while four justices said it was unconstitutional.
It may take an election upset for spouses to keep their surnames
June 24, 2021
Top court rejects new bid to let married couples have 2 surnames
June 23, 2021
Supreme Court’s Grand Bench to again hear dual surname issue
December 10, 2020
EDITORIAL: Top court ruling on use of dual surnames kicks issue back to Diet
June 24, 2021
Stories about memories of cherry blossoms solicited from readers
Cooking experts, chefs and others involved in the field of food introduce their special recipes intertwined with their paths in life.
A series based on diplomatic documents declassified by Japan’s Foreign Ministry
A series on the death of a Japanese woman that sparked a debate about criminal justice policy in the United States
A series about Japanese-Americans and their memories of World War II
Here is a collection of first-hand accounts by “hibakusha” atomic bomb survivors.
